Enhancing Effective Communication in the Age of Terrorism: Insights from Baruch Fischoff

In today’s world, where the threat of terrorism looms large, effective communication is essential. I discussed this topic with Baruch Fischoff of Carnegie Mellon University, shedding light on the critical role of communication in maintaining detailed, practical guidance, and preparation for various scenarios to maintain public trust and safety. But also to avoid exploitation of threats for political or financial gains.

The Power of Communication

After 9/11, many emphasized the need for advanced intelligence and technology to combat terrorism. However, Fischoff argues that clear and respectful communication is just as vital. Terrorists aim to undermine citizens’ faith in institutions. If people feel uninformed or exploited by their governments, their trust erodes. Therefore, communicating transparently and inclusively is crucial.

The Role of Communication Departments

Despite their importance, communication departments often lack authority in organizations. They usually report to legal or loss prevention departments, limiting their impact. Fischoff highlights 3 key functions of communication within organizations:

1. Internal Communication: Leadership must effectively communicate with employees and contractors.
2. Public Relations: Organizations need to manage their public image and convey their messages to legislators and the public.
3. Public Health Communication: This involves providing honest, scientifically sound information to help the public make informed decisions.

These functions are often in conflict, with public relations focusing on image while public health communication aims for transparency.

Balancing Information

Effective communication involves finding a balance between providing enough information to inform without overwhelming or scaring the public. Too much information or conflicting messages can cause confusion and fear, all the way to a loss of trust. Governments and organizations must aim for clarity and relevance in their communications, and above all, it must treat citizens with respect.

Government Communication Failures

Both Fischoff and his colleagues criticize governments for poor communication, often failing to convey useful information in crises. Communication departments are often undervalued, reporting through legal or loss prevention, and lack authority. For instance, emergency plans might advise citizens to ensure their water is potable without explaining how. This lack of detail can lead to ineffective public safety measures. Effective communication within organizations requires:

• leadership buy-in,
• skilled public relations,
• accurate, transparent public health communication.

Strategic Communication

Fischoff advocates for treating communication about life-and-death matters as a strategic function, integrated with leadership decisions. This involves scientific approaches to communication, including testing messages before dissemination. Without this, communication efforts can be chaotic and inept, as seen in various government advisories.

Citizen Involvement

Fischoff encourages citizens to engage with their local governments, questioning emergency plans and demanding clarity. This active participation can push for better-prepared and more effective communication strategies.

Effective communication in the age of terrorism requires a strategic approach, balancing transparency and clarity while avoiding information overload. By prioritizing and professionalizing communication efforts, governments and organizations can better protect and inform their citizens, maintaining trust and safety in turbulent times.

---

Watch the full interview with Baruch Fischoff